GUEST STRIP – SAM LOGAN
April 15th, 2005 | by Tom- Comics »
- Comics »
- Guest Strip
(4 votes, average: 7.25 out of 10)
Today’s comic comes to us from another Dayfree Press alumni, Sam Logan
*THE REST OF THE BLOG POST WAS LOST WHEN THEATER HOPPER MOVED TO WORDPRESS IN JANUARY 2009*
Is it weird that I had to employ the internet to uncover the lyrics to the Ewok celebration song from Return of the Jedi? I wasn’t sure if it was “Nub, nub!” or “Nuv, nuv!”
I suppose if it was “Nub, nub” the phrase “celebrate the love” would take on an entirely different meaning!
Family comic! Family comic! Bad artist! Bad!
We didn’t get a chance to see Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith over the weekend. Part of it was due to a busy schedule, but part of it was just good sense to stay away. We knew the theaters would be packed, and since I saw the movie on Wednesday, there was no need to torture ourselves. We’ll probably see it tonight when there will be less people in the theaters.
Anyway, instead of combating the nerd hordes, Cami and I instituted a little counter-programming this weekend and saw Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room. It’s a documentary adapted from the book by Bethany McLean and Peter Elkind.
What can I say about the film? It’s not a real heart-warmer, obviously. I guess while watching it, I kept thinking of that old saying “If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.” There’s plenty that Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling and Andrew Fastow perpetrated to be outraged over.
I won’t go into the details because I know reading about white collar corporate greed is just about as exciting as writing about it, but for your own edification, you should see this movie.
Co-author Bethany McLean hits the nail on the head very early in the film when she comments (and I’m paraphrasing) that the Enron scandal seems to have become this obtuse construct in the minds of the average American. Most people think that the scandal revolves around complicated transaction and the pocketing of hidden assets. That the money trail is too complicated to follow and therefore not worth attempting to understand.
In reality, the story of Enron is more about people. The hubris over the over-competitive and a compulsory need to prove superiority above authority. Their theories as to the personal motivations of Skilling in particular could be a wonderful psychological case study.
The movie touches lightly on a Republican conspiracy to oust California’s Democratic Governor Gray Davis by tracing the responsibilities of the rolling blackouts his state suffered back to Enron. This isn’t the focus of the film by any means. Ultimately, Enron was responsible for the blackouts, but money was their prime motivation. Still, it’s hard to deny their association to the Bush administration considering Enron was the largest corporate backer of that campaign.
But I’m getting off track. I don’t mean to politicize things and I don’t want to give the wrong impression. Ultimately, the movie takes what most perceive to be a very complicated issue and walks you through it step-by-step. After watching it, the puzzle pieces fit together much more easily and for that, I think it’s worth your movie going dollar.
Okay, so everyone understands the reference here? I don’t have to over explain it, do I?
Sometimes I get nervous when I do a comic that isn’t as formulaic as “set-up, explanation, beat, punch line.” But then again, maybe I’m over-estimating myself.
All I know is that waddle under George Lucas’ chin is pretty friggin’ distracting. He looks like he’s been cross-bred with a great African toad. That beard he sports isn’t so much a grooming choice any more, but a necessary device to indicate where his face ends and neck begins!
I know. That’s mean. But you like it when I’m snarky, don’t you? Don’t you?!
It’s kind of insane that Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith made $50 million on it’s opening day and another $108 million in the Friday to Sunday period immediately after. It’s especially insane when you compare it against the opening weekend tallys of it’s predecessors. Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace did $65 million and Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones did $80 million.
Of course there are things like inflation, ticket prices and the number of screens showing that you need to consider. For example, Revenge of the Sith showed on roughly 500 more screens than Attack of the Clones and 700 more screens than The Phantom Menace. When it’s been reported that recent years box office receipts have been in sharp decline, you have to wonder where are these other theaters are coming from.
For detailed analysis of the three Star Wars prequels, you can check my sources here, here and here.
Naturally, all of this box office posturing begs the question if this is information the average movie goer should even have access to.
There has been increased competitiveness between entertainment journalist outlets to report every shred of information about every production that is launched into theaters. Wrapped up in the coverage is how much the film makes. Less and less is there a question of quality. Now everyone wants to know how much a movie rakes in on it’s opening weekend. Anything less than $25 million dollars in those first three days is considered a failure. Compare that to 1977 when Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope movie did $7 in business it’s opening weekend and is widely considered to be the world’s first blockbuster – an international phenomenon!
Jeffery Wells over at Hollywood Elsewhere had some interesting reflections on the topic in his “Wired” column. Spurred by Anne Thompson’s recent Hollywood Reporter column about America’s disinterest in the winners at Cannes, his focus shifted to Sith and it’s box office take.
“What does it mean when a dust storm blows across Kansas and everyone covers their faces and stays inside their home(s)?” asks Wells. “Is this something to jump up and down about, examine from this and that angle, compare statistically to previous dust storms, and talk about the various ramifications with dust-storm experts like Paul Dergarabedian? People can go to see Sith by the mega-millions and a tip of the hat to those who have shrewdly profited from this, but in a better, smarter and more spiritually focused world, editors and journalists would try to report this dispiriting phenomenon with a bit more perspective…and without quite so much of a ‘yea, team!’ cheerleader tone.”
It’s hard to find complaints in the logic, except to say that it is optimistic at best. Reporting statistical data about a movies performance plays directly to our competitive nature and Wells knows this. It’s not unlike reporting the stats of a baseball game. RBIs or errors. Utterly meaningless in the grand scheme of things. It is “just a game,” after all. Merely entertainment. Movies should be viewed the same way.
All this said, the box office might of the Star Wars franchise makes it empirically impossible for the series to fade into the ether once Sith leaves theaters. Sure, there is talk of a couple TV series and I’m sure these characters will live on in a thousand different variations between comic books, video games, toys and novels. But for Lucas to definitively say “That’s it. No more movies.” is laughable.
As my good friend Joe pointed out in his strip from May 20 at Joe Loves Crappy Movies, in 150 years someone will own the rights to Star Wars and it WON’T be Lucas.
Lucas may own the rights to his characters, sequels featuring said characters and the merchandising thereof, but it won’t last forever. In fact, I doubt it will even take 150 years. It wouldn’t surprise me if in the next 20 to 25 years that Lucas will turn over his outlines for Episodes VII, VIII and IX to someone else and says “Have at them. Oh… and be sure to wire me 80% of all the profits.” to ensure that not only will his children never have to work again, but the great-great-great-great grandchildren living in a colony on the moon that he will never meet will also never have need to fear manual labour.
The Star Wars franchise has netted Lucas a reported $2 BILLION in earnings. It’s too damn profitable to encase the thing in carbonite for the rest of time.
Just my two cents…
I know it’s not incredibly inventive to joke about Harrison Ford being of retirement age when he puts on fedora for a fourth time this summer. In fact, I’ve commented on his decline as an action hero before. In my opinion, he needs to move onto more character pieces and leave the action movies to the young bucks – whoever they might be.
Frankly, I’m seeing a disturbing trend when it comes to trotting out these old action stars. Slyvester Stallone was first out of the gate with Rocky Balboa. He’ll do it again in Rambo 4: Pearl of the Cobra in 2008. Bruce Willis is dusting off John McClane in Live Free or Die Hard this summer. As reported last week, they’ve settled on a script and Harrison Ford will be playing Indiana Jones for the fourth time in 2008. It’s only a matter of time before Arnold Schwarzennegger’s term as California governor expires and I’ll bet dollars to donuts that he’ll throw his hat back into movie-making since all these other old guys are doing it. It’s riduculous and it has to stop. To that end, I’ve dedicated myself to making fun of this new trend in ’07 where ever I might see it.
Quick bit of news – we’re bringing back the talkcast.
Be sure to join myself, Joe Dunn from Joe Loves Crappy Movies and Gordon McAlpin from Multiplex tonight at 9:00 PM CST when we debut our new joint talkcast appropriately titled "The Triple Feature." The three of us will be getting together for an hour every Monday night at 9:00 PM to discuss the latest movie releases, comics and pop culture. We’ll be taking your calls throughout the show, so be sure to visit the TalkShoe web site about 15 minutes before hand so you’re in the room when we start broadcasting.
I think Joe and Gordon are itching to talk about Children of Men, which I’ve yet to see. But I can probably talk about the site redesign, or something, if things get slow.
If you want a sense of what to expect, you can download the first three shows from last year. They’re a lot longer than what we plan on doing in ’07, but Joe and Gordon made appearances in a few of them and you can download them to get a sense of how we interact. They’re a lot of fun to listen to!
I didn’t get an opportunity to make it to the theater this weekend. Cami’s baby shower was on Saturday afternoon and we pretty much spent all day Sunday organizing everything and washing clothes. It’s a crazy time to be alive! Can you believe A Night at the Museum took in $24 million in it’s third week? That means its box office is up to $164 million. Does that mean there is a sequel in the works? It’s the runaway hit of the holidays! Have you guys seen it? What did you think?
DVD REVIEW – INDIANA JONES: THE ADVENTURE COLLECTION
May 13th, 2008 | by Tom(2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 10)
At this point, reviewing the films in the Indiana Jones trilogy is a pointless exercise. For many of us, these films are woven into the tapestry of our lives – watched countless times on video and television. Enjoyed again and again with family and friends. They are omnipresent peaks in between the hills and valleys of the pop culture landscape. George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have created a series of timeless films whose legacy expands in one week with the release of Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull – nearly 19 years since the intrepid archeologist’s last adventure, Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade.
So, to that end, what is the reason behind re-releasing the first three films on DVD? Especially when they were first released (to much fanfare in 2003)? Clearly it’s a money grab on the part of Paramount, but a welcome one because included are several new bonus features that might be worth your while. Since the Indiana Jones trilogy set such a high water mark in the pop culture consciousness, we’ll be highlighting the DVD extras in this review rather than the films themselves to help you determine if this box set is something you want to add to your DVD collection. The re-released films can be found in stores today, Tuesday, May 13.
Each of the three films contain an “introduction” featuring Lucas and Spielberg speaking about their respective films, but it’s really more of a 20 minute retrospective than an introduction. These are the most revealing and insightful of the collections many extras specifically because they highlight something I’ve assumed for a long time.
George Lucas is an idiot.
Don’t get me wrong. I owe George Lucas a lot. He’s an amazing conceptualist who was able to envision whole galaxies and he has provided me a great deal of entertainment of the years. So I thank him for that.
But as an Executive Producer, he fails – and these featurettes prove it.
Talking about the casting decision to put Harrison Ford under Indy’s famous fedora, Lucas wasn’t for it. Savvy film fans know that the role was originally given to Tom Selleck who was unable to commit to the role due to his involvement with Magnum, P.I. For was Spielberg’s first choice, but Lucas objected siting the success of Star Wars and his concerns that audiences would only be familiar with Ford has Han Solo.
Similarly, for The Last Crusade, Lucas did not want Sean Connery for the role of Indy’s father – concerned that audiences would not accept him in the subordinate sidekick role. Additionally, he was concerned that audiences would only see Connery as 007 – despite the fact that he hadn’t made a James Bond movie (not counting Never Say Never Again) since 1965. Speilberg actually had to convince Lucas that James Bond was the prototype for Indiana Jones in several ways and therefore having Connery play Indiana Jones’s father made sense in a cinematic way.
Most damning, however, is the featurette on The Temple of Doom. Spielberg pretty much comes right out of the gate saying that the movie wasn’t profitable, it wasn’t well-liked by critics, is the most downbeat and least enjoyable of the original three films. Watching again for the first time in a few years, I myself had not noticed how bleak it actually is. Very violent and almost gory. Specifically, the scenes of child abuse in the temple strike a nerve in a way they haven’t before. I guess being a parent now, a switch must have flipped.
But what gets revealed here is Lucas’s insistence that The Temple of Doom go down a dark path. He insisted on it, in fact – siting the success of The Empire Strikes Back. In Lucas’s mind, the second act of a trilogy needs to be downbeat so the hero can rally and come back stronger in the third installment. He actually says this in the featurette.
But there’s a problem with this logic. The Indiana Jones trilogy was not written as one film like Star Wars was. They are episodic like the old Republic adventure serials. The second issue is that – chronologically – The Temple of Doom actually takes place one year before Raiders of The Lost Ark. So shouldn’t the first movie be the downtrodden one.
Most outrageously of all, after Spielberg talks about his distaste for the film, Lucas admits that it is also his least favorite of the three because of it’s dark tone. “I’m more of a humor guy,” he says.
WHAT?! I actually had to pause the DVD and rewind it to make sure I heard him right.
It just goes to show that Lucas doesn’t trust his actors or even his audience to interpret his films correctly. Points for professionalism go to Spielberg, however, who expresses that he was a director hired to execute Lucas’s vision and performed the role he was hired to do.
For those of you hoping for an audio commentary on these movies, you’re out of luck. The “introduction” featurettes are as close as you’re going to get to listening to Spielberg and Lucas wax philosophical on their films.
Other featurettes on Raiders of The Lost Ark include “Indiana Jones: An Appreciation” where cast members from Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of The Crystal Skull talk about the first three movies and their memories of each. It’s a fluff piece that will probably have greater context after The Kingdom of The Crystal Skull comes out on DVD, but, for now, feels highly promotional.
More interesting in the featurette “The Melting Face” where we go behind-the-scenes and talk to the effects supervisor who created the most nightmare-inducing effect of the early 80’s with Toht’s melting face after the Ark of the Covenant is opened. They show you how it’s done from start to finish, providing side-by-side comparisons to the original effect with a recreation developed specifically for release.
The featurettes on The Temple of Doom include “Creepy Crawlies” where critter wranglers on all three films discuss how they corralled all of the various snakes, bugs and rats to hit their marks and terrify the actors. They also hint at the tradition continuing in the fourth film, but don’t give away specifics as to what.
“Locations” highlight all of the remote areas around the globe that Indiana Jones shot to give the series it’s globetrotting vibe. Everywhere from Sri Lanka to Jordan, Vencie and Utah. Even the same canyon in Tunisia where R2-D2 was captured by Jawas in the first Star Wars!
Finally, The Last Crusade has a featurette called “Friends and Enemies” that provides an overview of the supporting characters in the Indiana Jones films and an exerpt from a sit down discussion with Karen Allen, Kate Capshaw and Alison Doody called “The Women: The American Fim Institute Tribute” which was originally recorded in conjunction with the film’s release on DVD five years ago.
The discussion starts out slow with each of the actresses talking more about how great Indiana Jones is as a character and less about their own contributions to the films.
Eventually, as things pick up, interesting tidbits about the actresses themselves are revealed. Alison Doody admit to being intimidated on set due to it being an early acting job and the most high profile one of her career. She talks about how Sean Connery “stole” her role as the sidekick of the picture and how she was offered several films featuring characters with Austrian accents after the film was released – even though she is Irish and had great trouble performing the accent in the film. She doesn’t come off as bitter, exactly. But more overwhelmed and maybe even slightly disinterested in the fame the film brought her.
Kate Capshaw spends a great deal of time talking about how critics ravaged the character of Willie Scott as annoying and grating and had very few kind things to say about her as well. In the way that she talks, you get the sense that she’s disassociated her performance and blames the critical response to how the character was written. “I told Stephen during filming,” Capshaw says, “that there was too much screaming!” Turns out she was right.
Interestingly enough, Spielberg goes on endlessly about Capshaw in the “introduction” featurette for The Temple of Doom. Despite the difficulties he had with the film, he says he can’t be too disappointed with the experience because it introduced him to Capshaw (they married in 1991). Spielberg talks at length about how enthralled he was with Capshaw’s performance, praising her comedic timing and gift for physical comedy. Nepotism runs pretty deep here.
It turns out that Karen Allen emerges as the most well-adjusted of Indy’s former flames. Still as effervescent as she was in the first film, it’s no doubt that same spunk brought her back to the role she left behind nearly 30 years in The Kingdom of The Crystal Skull.
Beyond that, each of the three films contain a storyboard sequence that compares drawings to the completed footage as well as multiple photo galleries featuring photos and props, production photography and portraits, effects and marketing materials. Some of the galleries are more interesting than others, specifically the effects and marketing sets. It’s kind of interested to see how Indiana Jones is repackaged for Japanese audiences.
Overall I don’t know if there is enough material here to warrant a repurchase of the DVDs if you already own the 2003 release. But if you don’t already own them and are looking for an excuse to get even MORE excited about The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, you can’t go wrong here. The films continue to entertain and they are simply a must for any serious DVD collection.
MOVIE REVIEW – INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL
May 26th, 2008 | by Tom(2 votes, average: 7.00 out of 10)
Typically, when a franchise fill series takes the better part of a generation to introduce another sequel into the pop culture landscape, the entry could be misconstrued as a money grab.
But, for whatever reason, the latest installment of the Indiana Jones is a film that fans have been chomping at the bit to see. Chalk it up to excellent marketing, and indelible heroic lead or perhaps the sands of time fogging the lens of nostalgia.
After all these years, does Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of The Crystal Skull hold up? Infuriatingly, yes and no. While not a dour or violent as the exhausting Indiana Jones and The Temple of Doom, Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of The Crystal Skull suffers from one too many head scratching, credibility straining moments that pull the view right out of the movie and suck the life from it.
However, the movie starts with a bang – literally. We catch up with our hero in 1957. Indy has been kidnapped and taken to a mysterious government warehouse in the middle of the Nevada dessert. His captor is KGB agent Irina Spalko, played with a hint of dominatrix glee by Cate Blanchet. She wants Indy to find an artifact that will give the Soviet army the upper hand in the escalating Cold War.
Indy’s romp and eventual escape from his Russian captors are the most exhilirating moments of the movie. And, although the sequence ends with one of those head-scratching moments I was referring to, you let it slide. Because it’s exactly the kind of "by the skin of your teeth" escape you wan to see Indiana Jones make.
Later on, when a switchblade-wielding greaser named Mutt Williams comes looking for Jones to help him track down his mother, also kidnapped by the Russians, it isn’t long before Indy is drawn back into the conflict.
What follows is a slow unraveling of the film’s initial bounce and swagger. The film begins to feel less like a treasure hunt and more like a series of unending action sequences.
Part of Indiana Jones’s appeal is that he is an everyman hero who can be hurt and complains about the obstacles being thrown in his path. While there is a certain amount of that bruiser charm on display here (largely at the expense of star Harrison Ford’s advancing age), eventually you feel like there simply isn’t enough time between harrowing escapes and near-misses for Indy to reflect on his mortality in a humorous way. The pacing of the film gives neither the audience or our hero time to rest.
By the time the film reaches it’s ultimate conclusion, it all kind of feels like a blur. Less of a “whodunnit” and more of a “whatwuzthat?”
The performances in the film are all well done – especially Harrison Ford who inhabits Indiana Jones so thoroughly, it’s the most fun I’ve had watching him on screen in years. Shia LaBeouf comes off less annoying than I expected, toning down his more frantic actorly tics and zeroing in on the "not quite a nerd, not quite a hunk" niche he occupies so well.
But some of the characters feel perfunctory. Ray Winstone as a duplicitous adventurer adds nothing but dead-weight and false conflict to the proceedings. Karen Allen returns as Marion Ravenwood – Indiana Jones’s one, true love. But her contribution feels less like a contextual advancement of the plot but more of a "fill in the blank" role required to explain relationships between characters.
With these check marks in the minus column, the movie doesn’t fail completely. Even though I recognize some of the more awful, groan-inducing moments (Shia LaBeouf – Kind of the Monkeys, anyone?) the movie delivered the kind of entertainment I was looking for. In some ways, it ignites the imagination in unexpected ways.
For example, it was alluded that Jones spent his time between adventures operating behind enemy lines in World War II and was designated the Army rank of Colonel. Both my wife and I turned to each other at the same time and said”I want to see THAT movie!”
But, for what is is, Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of The Crystal Skull does not disappoint.
I think fanboys who are looking to pick apart every last detail of the movie won’t have a problem finding weaknesses in it’s armor. But, within it’s given context, how disappointed can you be? The sci-fi elements of the film fit within the 1950’s time period the movie takes place. The fantastic escapes and cartoonish villains really aren’t any worse than what Indy has faced in the past.
This is the double-edged sword of nostalgia. Some people will remember the original movies for being better than they were. Or, at least assume that Kingdom of Skull will always be the runt of the litter.
My biggest complaints have to do less with content and more with execution. Director Steven Spielberg swore up and down that the film would rely on practical effects and there is a little too much CGI for my taste in this picture. Some of the more knowing nods to past adventures could have been eliminated and the movie probably could have benefited from a little bit of a trim on its running time.
But overall? Fun is fun and Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of The Crystal Skull is an adventure I would line up for again in a heartbeat.
At this point, Star Wars: The Clone Wars has been so thoroughly and universally dismissed, there’s almost no point in joining the chorus. But, dammit, I spent my $8.50 and I sat through this slag heap that calls itself a movie, so I’m gonna have my say!
Before I work up a boil, let my preface things by stating that I understand that Star Wars: The Clone Wars isn’t as much of a movie as it is an extended television cartoon show as it is comprised of the first three episodes that will air on the Cartoon Network later this year.
As such, I also understand that I – a robust man of 30 – is not the target demo for this movie. It’s aimed squarely at the hearts and minds of 7-year-olds instead.
With this information factored in (and my expectations already set low by the advance reviews), I have to state that Star Wars: The Clone Wars is probably one of THE WORST movies I have ever seen. Period. This movie didn’t disappoint in the manner that the second trilogy of films did. Where, as a fan, you watch them and say “That’s cool, but I wish they would have done this instead…” You don’t compare it to the other Star Wars movies and say,”Well, I liked the first trilogy better.”
No. You don’t compare Star Wars: The Clone Wars to other movies in the Star Wars franchise. You compare them against other movies that suck.
It’s one thing to do the nitpicky fanboy thing and complain about how the movie didn’t have the text crawl in the opening moments or how you’re supposed to root for Anakin and his new padawan Ashoka with the full knowledge that Anakin will be the architect of her murder by the next movie chronologically. It fails from a pure narrative standpoint. It’s nothing but a punch of posturing, cliched one-liners that string together one battle sequence with another.
And, OH! Those battle sequences! SO. BORING. Seriously, I fell asleep probably somewhere around the start of the second act. I wouldn’t normally admit that, except I’ve been reading several comments from others that admit the same. Should I be falling asleep during a battle sequence?
That speaks to the larger problem with The Clone Wars. Think back to Episode IV: A New Hope when Alex Guiness as Obi-One Kenobi casually mentions fighting alongside Anakin Skywalker in The Clone Wars. Fans have been trying to imagine what that must have been like for over 30 years!
Along comes the second trilogy and they don’t really address it. They focus more on Anakin’s fall to The Dark Side. Okay, makes sense. All six movies are really about Anakin, his transformation and redemption. But now we have a movie about nothing BUT The Clone Wars! Imagine what they’ll do with it!
And they do… nothing. There’s no weight. No impact. Even the lightsaber duels are tepid and by-the-book. Considering the film is ANIMATED, they had a real opportunity to take the chains off and show us action sequences that stretch beyond the threshold of what would be believable in a live-action film. They had cart blanch to do whatever they wanted and they didn’t take it.
That’s what offends me most about this film. Screenwriter Henry Gilroy (whose resume is rife with mediocre television cartoon credits) was given the keys to the kingdom. He had the opportunity to play around with some of the most inventive cinematic creations and concepts of the last 50 years and he did NOTHING new with them.
I can’t put all the blame on his shoulders. After all, I’m sure Lucas had to sign off on it at some point. But the movie is just one giant missed opportunity in my mind and it really has no business in theaters after being advertised as the missing link in the second trilogy.
Seriously – the ads and trailers for this movie made it look dark and serious. Instead we have “Stinky” the Hutt and a padawan that calls Anakin “Sky Guy” BLECH!
This “movie” should have been relegated to television where the fanboys would have tuned in, still think it was crap, but given it a pass because Hey, it’s for kids. I mean, no one finds The Star Wars Holiday Special, Droids or Ewoks a threat to official movie cannon and that’s because they started on television. People take it less seriously. It’s fun. We get it.
Instead, Star Wars: The Clone Wars gets pumped into theaters to clean more cash out of the wallets of fans who deserve better than to be lied to.
I wish I could compliment the film a little. I give it points for it’s visual style. Which – while chunky – has a nice painterly style and is dramatically and effectively lit.
But any compliment I could extend the film feels like a hollow gesture in light of the larger betrayal the movie represents toward the franchise.
I understand the importance of replenishing the well with younger fans. But the WHOLE POINT of the Star Wars movies is that it makes adults feel like kids again. That they can slip into another universe full of fantastic adventure and mystical religions – noble knights and deathly villains.
Instead, they’re spitting on our minds.
…
That’s enough for now. If you’d like to hear more about Star Wars: The Clone Wars, be sure to tune into The Triple Feature tonight at 9:00 PM CST.
I know Joe isn’t looking forward to the show because he actually liked the movie. But I promise to keep it civil. My negative reactions are personal. If you liked the movie, good for you. But for me… no dice.
Oh, and for the adults, we’ll be talking about Tropic Thunder as well.
Talk to you soon!