This is kind of old news, but I'm playing catch up this week, so bear with me.

On Monday, rumors started flying that Kevin Costner had been cast in Zack Snyder's reboot of Superman. It didn't take very long before Latino Review reported that he would be playing Jonathan "Pa" Kent - Superman's adoptive father.

I think this is a mistake. When I think of Costner, I don't think of him as a father figure. Nor do I ascribe a nurturing moral center to his list of character attributes.

I think Costner would have been better utilized playing Clark Kent's brassy Daily Planet Editor Perry White. It's a bit part, sure. Probably not worth Costner's time. But it's a better fit.

Costner is one of those actors that everyone WANTS to like, but he's got a bit of an a-hole streak in him. I put him in the same category that I put Hugh Grant in - an actor who tried to win people over with charm and good looks but who is ultimately more effective playing self-centered rouges.

I can easily see Costner wearing a vest, chewing on a pipe and barking orders at a grown up Clark Kent than I can see him wearing bib overalls, chewing on a wheat stalk and giving the teenage Superman advice about doin' what's right.

Costner has a slow, considerate nature in his performances that I think might have blinded Snyder to the opportunity right under his nose and made him think he was better for Pa Kent. But in my view, Perry White would have been the more interesting father figure for Costner to pursue.

What are your thoughts? Leave your comments below!