I made a promise to come in and talk about the controversy over Crash upsetting Brokeback Mountain for the Best Picture Oscar.



But I gotta be truthful: I'm not as upset about it as I was before.



I haven't seen Crash, so I can't vouch for it's worthiness or unworthiness. But at the time when Jack Nicholson read the name of the winning film from that card, I was shocked. To me, Brokeback seemed like the more culturally relevant film. Just in terms of the awareness it brought to homosexual relationships as fully realized partnerships. Not a gimmick. Not a flamboyant supporting plot device. But just as rich and detailed as any straight love story.



I've heard from some people that Brokeback wouldn't have gotten the same amount of attention if it weren't about gay cowboys. There might be some truth to that, but I don't think so. I think audiences are interested in well-crafted stories regardless of the main character's sexual orientation. To me, the fact that Brokeback was about a gay couple was secondary. It's about cowardace and not standing up for the most important things in life. It's about caving to self-imposed and societal expectations and not having the strength to question them. You could swap out two gay characters with two straight ones and it wouldn't have changed the overall theme of the movie - That love is hard-earned and not for the weak. The characters could be a Muslim and a Jew, a black man and a white woman or your next door neighbors. The whole "gay issue" is a non-point to me.



That said, and presuming that both Brokeback and Crash are equally well-made films (represented by their equal share of earned Oscars in technical categories), at one point I questioned if there was perhaps some kind of bias against Brokeback because Academy voters couldn't see past the "gay issue."



I think Crash may have also had a "home-field" advantage in and of that it is a movie set and filmed in L.A. and that's where 80% of the voting block resides. Also considering the location of the shoot was probably a touch point for voters considering that most productions are being farmed out to Canada, Australia and Prague to cut costs. Filming in their own backyard was something the voters wanted to reward perhaps as a means to encourage production to stay in Tinsletown.



But overall, you have to question if perhaps the homosexual aspect of the film was not something voters wanted to appear to endorse. It was tackled at the top of the show that Hollywood was out of touch with mainstream America. A win for Brokeback would have been a strong confirmation of that point to those critics. Why give them more ammunition?



Jeffery Wells of Hollywood Elsewhere made an interesting point about the whole thing. I quote,

It's food for thought.



I shared that thought for a while, but I think it's since worked it's way out of my system. Friday's comic will reflect that and, I think, from there we can all move forward.